What is the difference between sb 1070 and hb 56

Join other people of faith at the Supreme Court for a hour prayer vigil from 10am Monday April 23 — 10am Wednesday April A Jericho Walk will take place the morning of Wednesday, April 25, when the justices will be hearing oral arguments about SB Click here to learn more about events that day. Spread the word about the need for comprehensive immigration reform and SB Your neighbors and members of your church may be unfamiliar with the facts.

Tweet your opposition to SB using the hashtag vigil4justice Join the LIRS Stand for Welcome campaign to hear of ways you can get involved in advocacy with refugees and migrants.

This blog is a good place to updates on the struggle against SB style laws — please sign up to have posts delivered to your mailbox! Law Enforcement : A law enforcement officer can arrest a person if the officer has a removal order, detainer, notice of action or if the officer has probable cause to believe the person has been indicted or convicted of one or more aggravated felonies.

Law enforcement officers can also impound motor vehicles for violations of crimes related to moving, transporting, concealing, harboring, or shielding illegal aliens. The Department of Corrections must verify citizenship or immigration status of criminal offenders. Status as a foreign national must be considered in setting bail or bond requirements. The law establishes state crimes for false ID, identity fraud, transport, and harboring.

E-Verify : State agencies, political subdivisions and contractors with public contracts for services with the state or a political subdivision are required to use E-Verify. Certain state income tax credits and deductions are banned for individuals who are prohibited from being hired as employees, unless the employer participated in the E-Verify program. State agencies and localities must verify eligibility for federal, state and local benefits and unemployment compensation.

The office of management and budget must calculate costs of illegal immigrants to Indiana and request Congressional reimbursement. The law urges the legislative council to assign immigration topics for further study and consult with the lieutenant governor.

City of Indianapolis, et al. Law enforcement : If a law enforcement officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person who is stopped, detained, or arrested is an alien unlawfully in the United States, the officer or his agency is required to verify the immigration status of that person.

A law enforcement officer would then contact U. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to determine if that person should be arrested for immigration violations. An officer may not consider race, color, or national origin while implementing this law. All public contractors and subcontractors are required to use E-Verify. When a private employer's licenses are suspended, the private employer may not seek reinstatement of the licenses for a period of five years.

After five years, the director may grant reinstatement of licenses if the private employer goes on probation for three years, terminated the unauthorized alien, and pays a reinstatement fee equal to the cost of investigating and adjudicating the matter. Exemptions are provided for emergency health care, disaster and emergency assistance, prenatal care, child and adult protective services. Identification : This act does not implement, authorize, or establish, and shall not be construed to implement, authorize, or establish the federal Real ID Act of It is unlawful for a person to make, issue, or sell, a false, fictitious, fraudulent, or counterfeit picture identification that is for use by an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States.

It is unlawful for a person eighteen years of age or older to fail to carry any certificate of alien registration. Legal challenge : On October 31, the U. State of South Carolina and Nikki R. Haley in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina.

On December 22, , the U. District Court enjoined three provisions of South Carolina Act 69 related to making it a state crime for transporting or harboring illegal immigrants; making it a state crime for failure to carry a federal immigration registration document; and requiring law enforcement to determine immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion the person is in the country illegally.

The compact received support from a broad range of sectors, including state and local officials, the Salt Lake Chamber, the Sutherland Institute, law enforcement, advocacy and religious organizations. Utah was the first state this year to address immigration reform in a comprehensive package. H, an omnibus law, addresses employment, identification and verification, human trafficking and law enforcement. H creates the Utah Commission on Immigration and Migration Act, addresses integration of immigrants in the state, and provides for the creation of the Migrant Worker Visa Pilot Program.

It also commissions a study of the impact of illegal immigration on Utah. H creates a pilot sponsor resident immigrant program. The law requires implementation of the law to be consistent with federal immigration law, civil rights, and privileges and immunities of U. Employers with more than 15 employees must verify employment eligibility through E-Verify, an equivalent federal electronic verification system, the Social Security Administration or an independent third-party system with equal reliability.

Law enforcement may request verification for a class B or C misdemeanor. H creates an advisory Utah Commission on Immigration and Migration composed of 27 members of the legislature and executive agencies and members of the public appointed by the Speaker, Senate President, and Governor. The Commission shall: review the economic, legal, cultural and educational impact of illegal immigration; review federal and Utah laws related to immigration.

The Commission shall also develop a state plan on immigration and integration and make recommendations to the governor and the legislature, with an initial report in six months followed by annual reports. The law establishes a migrant worker visa pilot project and authorizes Utah to work with the State of Nuevo Leon, Mexico to fill jobs in Utah. H provides for the Pilot Sponsored Resident Immigrant Program Act, under which a resident immigrant may reside, work, and study in the State.

It provides that a resident of the State and a U. The law requires that an officer verify the immigration status of a person arrested for a felony or a class A misdemeanor and a person booked for class B or C misdemeanors. It clarifies when passengers in a vehicle where the operator has been detained may also be questioned and their immigration status verified. It requires verification of immigration status regarding application for public services or benefits provided by a state or local governmental agency or subcontractor, except as exempted by federal law.

Legal challenge : On May 10, U. The case is Utah Coalition of La Raza et al. Gary Herbert and Mark Shurtleff. On November 22, , the U. Department of Justice filed a complaint against HB As of June, , 30 states considered 53 omnibus bills.

Six omnibus bills have been enacted; 21 are pending or carryover bills; and 26 have failed. These omnibus bills include multiple topics in one bill such as immigration law enforcement, employment verification, and verification of lawful status for public benefits. Department of Homeland Security. This chart lists the 53 omnibus bills , bill status as ofJune 30, bill title, and brief summary. Click here for printer friendly version of chart PDF Note: In the first half of , state legislators in the 50 states and Puerto Rico considered 1, bills and resolutions relating to immigrants and refugees.

State legislators enacted laws and resolutions. This lawsuit has not yet been fully resolved. The U. The Court already had struck down several other provisions of the law in The National Immigration Law Center has served as co—lead counsel in each of these legal challenges. Though the law was packaged as part of a compromise, in truth, HB would have had the same effect on Latinos, Asian Americans, and immigrants as SB did.

A lawsuit was filed against this law in May , and the U. The restraining order remains in place today, and the chief architect of HB , Stephen Sandstrom, has since publicly denounced his own legislation. Key components of this law were initially blocked. Indiana lawmakers also passed legislation that would have criminalized interactions with immigrants.

Civil rights groups sued the state, and a federal district court agreed to block key provisions of this law. The state declined to appeal the decision, and the provisions remain permanently blocked.